Ok, so far as we have now 2 scans that was made in the same conditions... I try to explain. There are two types of scanners thas have different image sensors: CIS-type and CCD-type. There is a few significant differences between them (it was described at the upper link, and CCD much better than CIS), and one of them is Depth of field. CCD-type uses most of Depth of field than SIC, that is: CCD-type can scan a page situated over the CCD-scanner's glass, whereas for CIS-type is necessary maximum fit of a page to the CIS-scanner's glass.
So the reason of this larger blurry area is a type of your scanner: it's CIS. My scanner is CCD, which is why our results of scanning are so different.
Idk how to help with it. =( I tried to find a method to taking a better scan for CIS-type of scanner, but mostly sites said "use a flat pages, take apart your book, or use CCD".
...You may completely ruin the book if you continue to scan with maximum pressing. ((
no subject
Ok, so far as we have now 2 scans that was made in the same conditions...
I try to explain.
There are two types of scanners thas have different image sensors: CIS-type and CCD-type. There is a few significant differences between them (it was described at the upper link, and CCD much better than CIS), and one of them is Depth of field.
CCD-type uses most of Depth of field than SIC, that is: CCD-type can scan a page situated over the CCD-scanner's glass, whereas for CIS-type is necessary maximum fit of a page to the CIS-scanner's glass.
So the reason of this larger blurry area is a type of your scanner: it's CIS.
My scanner is CCD, which is why our results of scanning are so different.
Idk how to help with it. =(
I tried to find a method to taking a better scan for CIS-type of scanner, but mostly sites said "use a flat pages, take apart your book, or use CCD".
...You may completely ruin the book if you continue to scan with maximum pressing. ((