Hmmmm... I remember your scans of TOA Visual Fanbook, it was a good scans in 300 dpi, but they have the same problem. How do you press the book down to the scanner's glass? Do you use a lid or your own hands? If a lid - try to scan without it, I always press with my hands and press a back of book with force.
It's also depend on the scanner. Which model you use? It is CCD-type or CIS-type? Read here about CIS and CCD scanner comparison. My scanner is CCD-type, I'm afraid your may be CIS-type (that is: even if you do your best to make a good scans, your scanner unable to do what you want).
And which programm you use to scan?
Jpg is better, as far I know, and you'll get an image not a pdf-file. They say that tif is better than jpg and pdf, but I never work with tif. lol, it's a reason to try. ) Do you need another scan, by chance?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2012-12-31 10:26 pm (UTC)I remember your scans of TOA Visual Fanbook, it was a good scans in 300 dpi, but they have the same problem.
How do you press the book down to the scanner's glass? Do you use a lid or your own hands? If a lid - try to scan without it, I always press with my hands and press a back of book with force.
It's also depend on the scanner. Which model you use? It is CCD-type or CIS-type?
Read here about CIS and CCD scanner comparison.
My scanner is CCD-type, I'm afraid your may be CIS-type (that is: even if you do your best to make a good scans, your scanner unable to do what you want).
And which programm you use to scan?
Jpg is better, as far I know, and you'll get an image not a pdf-file.
They say that tif is better than jpg and pdf, but I never work with tif.
lol, it's a reason to try. )
Do you need another scan, by chance?